In astronomical terms, a supernova is the last stage of a dying star. And lately, Latvian media have speculated that national final Supernova — and even Latvia’s participation in Eurovision — could be headed in the same direction. But Supernova producer Ilze Jansone has spoken out, saying that talk of the national final’s demise has been greatly exaggerated.

Earlier this week, Latvian media reported that the fate of Latvia at Eurovision 2020 was uncertain. Latvia Television (LTV) board member Ivars Priede told a Latvian government subcommittee on media policy that the broadcaster had not yet decided if they would participate in Eurovision 2020.

He noted that the cost for Latvia to participate in Eurovision was €300,000. Priede suggested that the regular national final Supernova could still be held, or the broadcaster could opt for a reduce format.

But is this a sign of doom for Supernova? Or just a political power play from LTV, hoping for more government funding?

Supernova producer Ilze Jansone has spoken out about the situation, saying that “talk of Supernova’s death has been greatly exaggerated.”

Runas par projekta “Supernova” n?vi man? pasaul? ir stipri p?rsp?l?tas. Mums t? nav tikai ail?te budžet?, mums tie ir…

Posted by Ilze Jansone on Thursday, September 5, 2019

In a Facebook post, Jansone explained that the contest is more than just its budget — “We’re people in the industry: singers, songwriters, producers, sound engineers, dancers, choreographers, recording studios, photographers.” Jansone noted that Supernova also creates money for the music industry through royalties and digital distribution.

And while Latvia has not qualified for the Eurovision grand final since 2016, Jansone says “No, we are not ashamed that we do not qualify for the Eurovision finals. We are proud to have a participant who is respectfully representing the country.”

Jansone ends on an optimistic note, saying,  “I believe that Supernova 2020 will be and together with our partners we will find a chance to do it!”

LTV has told media that their initial response for participating in Eurovision 2020 has to be made by mid-September, and an early October deadline for signing on for confirmed participation.

Latvia at Eurovision

While Latvia won Eurovision 2002, it hasn’t had the same luck in recent years. In the past 11 years, Latvia has only qualified for the grand final two times, in 2015 and 2016. Both times, with songs written by Latvian pop powerhouse Aminata.

In the last three years, Latvia has languished in the semi-finals, with fans sometimes complaining that better songs were left unselected in the Supernova grand final. Most recently folk group Carousel placed 15th in its semi-final with the low-key “That Night”.

Whatever LTV decides to do for its Eurovision 2020 participation, there will be at least some pressure to get the Baltic state back in the grand final.

What do you think? Is Supernova doomed? Does it need to be revamped? Or is it just fine as it is? Tell us your thoughts below!

Read more Latvia Eurovision news here

36
Leave a Reply

avatar
15 Comment threads
21 Thread replies
1 Followers
 
Most reacted comment
Hottest comment thread
21 Comment authors
uzhasLoin diciKarlanBalonowaTom Recent comment authors
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Karlan
Guest
Karlan

Latvia’s problem is that not their best song wins on their selection, always.On Supernova 2019 there were a lot of good songs.Carousel-“That night”-just weak dull kakaha.Tautas Dziesma, Atom and Fireworks were great.

Quuq
Guest
Quuq

They should’ve chosen Markus Riva and they would’ve got to the final.

Tom
Guest
Tom

Hahaha keep it realll he would be in semi

Balonowa
Guest
Balonowa

He can’t worse than Carousel. That’s for sure.

Rockfan
Guest
Rockfan

I think the songs are good enough. Daring, alternative, original, not ESC cliches. BUt of course what is good enough might not me good enough for you…or whatever Dodgy sung 🙂 But I think they are have strong entries with a character

Loin dici
Guest

Actually, Latvia’a selection ain’t bad. They just need the press+eurofans to freaking pay attention to them.

Rockfan
Guest
Rockfan

The less ESC-fans involved, the better 🙂 And I say this as a HUGE ESC-fan. WE are not the cetre of the world. Even if we wanted 😉

Loin dici
Guest

Not saying that it’s the absolute way to go, but in the modern days the press helps quite a lot on their success. I really think Latvia lacked attention for the past three years.

Skiwalko
Guest
Skiwalko

As much as I love “That Night” and think that “Supernova” is one of the best NFs in terms of production value, an internal selection might be a good experiment for Latvia. It would give them far more time to prepare a quality song and its staging concept. There’d always be some risk, that certain Markus would be selected using this method, but let’s look at other possibilities. Maybe MADARA would be interested? Maybe Edgars Kreilis would get a killer song?

Latvian
Guest
Latvian

There is no way that Markus will represent Latvia. At all.

Loin dici
Guest

Why?

a lett
Guest
a lett

Markus has never really been liked by the general Latvian public (same goes for Samanta T?na)

IMHO we should skip a year or two (most Latvians have been asking for that for years) and change some things regarding the selection, like getting rid of adding the Spotify streams and Alfa votes to the score and perhaps inviting foreign jurors.

Rockfan
Guest
Rockfan

Their songs lack the honesty and originality which is typical for Latvian entries

Karlan
Guest
Karlan

Send ATOM, eblany.

Rockfan
Guest
Rockfan

And thanks for that 😀

Azaad
Guest
Azaad

I don’t think Markus would be a bad pick actually. He has a decent amount of charisma and can pull televotes from the Russian diaspora, and the songs he’s submitted in supernova are admittedly basic but lend themselves to good staging. Moreover, if he finally got to go he’d be less likely to enter supernova subsequently

FYROM
Guest
FYROM

every year i forget theyre even taking part

Azaad
Guest
Azaad

For a country with their luck in the contest, their attitude is quite refreshing. If they didn’t withdraw during a six year spell that never saw them come even remotely close to qualifying, they won’t quit after just three years out of the final (especially when Laura came so close and would’ve made it with the juries).

Skiwalko
Guest
Skiwalko

Interestingly, they announced their withdrawal back in 2009, but later on they cancelled it and sent Intars Busulis to Moscow (only to get their first, but not last, last place in the semi).

Alex
Guest
Alex

Latvia was close in 2014 tho.
They were 10th with televote but juries killed its chances (+ 4 countries only used juries in that SF which made juries to have even more power)

Eurovisionfan12
Guest
Eurovisionfan12

It’d be a shame if they actually withdraw (because I really like their songs they recently sent), but maybe they could do a Ukraine and Portugal, sit our for one year and reevaluate Supernova as there are a lot of things that needs to be revamped.

If they do cancel the current format I have a feeling that they’ll internally select Markus Riva (and even make a one-artist Supernova with him with 3-4 songs)

Mr. Vanilla Bean
Guest
Mr. Vanilla Bean

I never got that argument of sitting it out (unless there’s no money, but even then, institutions usually find money for worse things if they want to). It’s one song/act a year, surely, people can sit out the entire summer and autumn and come up with something decent for May, while drinking cherry absinth. If they were to select Markus Riva, one song would be plenty. They should really help him get a listenable one. Just one.

Latvian
Guest
Latvian

There is no way Markus will represt Latvia. At all.

uzhas
Guest
uzhas

Markus Riva would never be selected by LTV

Latvian
Guest
Latvian

If Patrisha wins I’m happy either way

Tibor
Guest
Tibor

Latvia has sent mostly quality over the last five years. They shouldn’t let the disappointing results get to them.

Trash KAN
Guest
Trash KAN

They can internally select Tautumeitas and all will be forgiven

Idksmth
Guest
Idksmth

NO, NO, NO

Rockfan
Guest
Rockfan

What kind of music is that? Sounds cool by the name…for what ‘s it’s worth

Rockfan
Guest
Rockfan

I heard one of their songs. Sound just unusual enough, original enough, uncompromised enough, daring enough, “cool” enough..l.for what I love about Latvia 🙂 The song I heard might have gone top 10 in ESC

uzhas
Guest
uzhas

If Poland didn’t qualify this year, Tautumeitas would most likely flop as well

Deven O’Kearney
Guest
Deven O’Kearney

Supernova is just “Euro Dziesma” with a different name. It hasn’t delivered better results (if anything Latvia has gotten WORSE results) and the two qualifications that it has given us were because of Aminata.

Might be time to try an internal selection?

Mr. Vanilla Bean
Guest
Mr. Vanilla Bean

Keep it. I like the name.

James
Guest
James

Apart from being a national selection for Eurovision, Supernova as a musical variety show is a great introduction for those wanting to hear contemporary Latvian music.

Rockfan
Guest
Rockfan

Good news – for what it seems! Supernova is a great NF, and it would be such a pity if they canceled. I think actually Latvia has BOTH brought some of the best NFs and the best ESC-entries. I like how they just stick to their own style, not trying to “fit in” for ESC. Often interesting, alternative and original songs.

Joe
Guest
Joe

Latvia are one of only a handful of active Eurovision countries that have never withdrawn once (the others are Albania, Australia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Moldova, and Spain), so it’d be a shame for that to end. Plus, next year is the twentieth anniversary of their first appearance.