For the second year in a row, the country that won the televote did not win the Eurovision title. That has sparked calls for jury reform not just in Russia, which won the televote, but also in countries including Poland, Austria and Serbia, all of whom were let down by the juries.

Eurovision 2016: Grand final split results

First let’s take a look at the overall results, which show Ukraine’s Jamala was the most consistent performer across both halves of the equation. She came second to Russia’s Sergey Lazarev in the televote by a relatively small margin of 38 points. To put that in perspective, she was 101 points ahead of Poland’s Michal Szpak, who finished third in the televote with 222 points. They were the only three competitors who managed to crack 200 points with the people.

Australia’s Dami Im, who finished second overall, and Russia’s Sergey Lazarev, who finished third, did not have the same consistency across televoting and jury voting.

Australia won the jury vote in a landslide — 320 points to Jamala’s 211. But she could only muster fourth place with the public. Russia’s Sergey won the televote, but could only manage fifth place with the juries — finishing behind Australia, Ukraine, France and Malta.

Eurovision 2016 jury televote split grand final

In the chart below, we’ve ranked countries by the difference in their jury ranking and their televote ranking. A negative score means that the jury hurt a country, while a positive score means they helped them.

Eurovision 2016 split results jury hurt

For instance, Poland’s Michal Szpak came third with the televote. But he only finished 25th — yes, next to last — with the jury, only besting last-place finisher Jamie-Lee from Germany. He was the contestant most hurt by the jury.

Austria’s Zoë sees a disparity of 22, having reached eighth position with the public, but just 24th with the jury.

Others losing out because of the jury include Serbia’s Sanja (-12) and Azerbaijan’s Samra (-7).

Malta’s Ira Losco benefitted the most from the inclusion of a jury. She only ranked 21st with the televoting public, but managed fourth place with the juries.

It’s well-known that Israel must contend with prejudices and criticism from abroad and that this can impact its results. Hovi Star only managed 22nd with televoters, but he pulled eighth place with the juries.

Others who benefitted from the inclusion of the jury include Belgium’s Laura (+10) and the United Kingdom’s Joe & Jake (+8).

Ukraine’s Jamala was the only contestant whose ranking with the juries and televoters was the same. She finished second with both.

Total
374
Shares
  Subscribe  
newest oldest most voted
Notify of
Williamemake
Guest

“??¦When interviewed, Torah’s father at first only replied ‘I have no daughter!’ before his wife politely and self-effactingly reminded her husband that his comment was a Jewish epithet and not a traditional Amish one. The father then retorted ‘mox nix which cheek is turned, both will still be burning in Hell!’ and went back to churning the day’s quota of butter.” FileMaker Pro 11 Advanced The preview version of GigJam ??“ a collaboration app inbound for Office 365 that allows users to easily share all manner of content ??“ was made available to all comers.

Williamemake
Guest

maybe you have to edit the manifest inside the main executable??¦ I had to do so with some java app??¦ but it’s harder and you have to get a resource editor Ableton Live 9 Suite The portions marked with brown labels at the beginning and end of the graph represent the buffer use when data is imported into HDFS. After TeraSort starts, buffer use increases; however, buffer use is not very different than for TeraSort without writing data to HDFS because MapReduce jobs in general have a higher priority than background jobs such as copying data to HDFS.

Kaya
Guest

Micha? Szpak deserved better position from jury, but anyway, the televoting showed who the European people liked 🙂

Bart Staelens
Guest

The reason why the Polish diaspora didn’t have such an impact in previous years is because the voting system has changed this year. If the voting system wasn’t changed Poland would have been 19th place instead of 8th place. With this new system countries like Poland will qualify every year in the future because of the televoting no matter if they send a good or bad song. I think the televoting results were more ridiculous than the jury results. (For exemple: Israel 11 points??? Malta 16 points???? and then Poland 222 points??? Even before Australia????)

ESCaddict
Guest

Regarding the Polish result, ESC fans have to accept they have different music tastes than home viewers of ESC.
I think Pollaponk are a good example. Fans consistently ranked them close to the bottom but they went to the grand final & got a respectable place. That was not Icelandic diaspora.
This year Poland was popular. Deal with it.

ESCaddict
Guest

I used to be the biggest supporter of juries but not anymore. For the second year in a row they have screw up the result.

Juries do NOT guarantee the best song wins. They gave the prize to Sweden’s Heroes which was just a generic pop song with good staging. Not even the public were fooled.

Either the juries go or we have 2 separate prizes; the juror’s choice and the people’s choice.

Astrid
Guest
I don’t get the East versus West discussion i read. In the last few years Sweden won twice and Austria another one. Those countries did not win without votes from all around Europe just like Jamala got votes from the east and west. The fact that she came second with both the popular vote and the jury vote shows she is the right winner. If people want a different kind of winner than you should lobby better in your own country. EBU does not change the rules for that. To be honest i don’t think Europe was smart in selecting… Read more »
Mariam
Guest

I think the jury should come out of this competition because they had failed to appreciate the objectively all of the participating countries . EBU, You need to change voting rules.
Jury voting must be up to 100 points and the jury will be assess the show, performance of all the participating countries till 100 points . In this case, voting can to some extent be fair.

Bart
Guest

Just so you all can let off steam, Margaret’s ‘Cool me down’ video is out and reviewed on Popjustice! http://www.popjustice.com/videos/margaret-cool-me-down/

Piotr
Guest

@Ann

I won’t discuss with you anymore, I’m just wondering why everything you’ve written in English except your lat comment, maybe that’s because you used there some not great words and you believed that noone would understand in Polish? 🙂 best regards. Don’t wanna fight, can see that I won’t convince you, but you’ll see it all next year 😉

Ann
Guest

Redfox offends Poles, but it’s my comment is awaiting moderation. May I ask why? Unles Piotr is moderator:)

Aga
Guest

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4OCf5n-dyTY

Polish diaspora rules OK !! 😉

an esc fan
Guest

There is google translator, we can find out what are you talking about.
Stop glorify ukrainean song, it is the biggest manipulation and the bets are
ment to make people act like sheeps. I know people who bet on the australian
song without listening it ever, they’ve just heard that is the right choice to
win money.

Piotr
Guest
@Ann Yyy… ale popis kultury 🙂 Zajmuje sie polskimi emigrantami bo artykul dotyczy Polski geniuszu. Jesli chodzi o Ukraine to oczywiscie zgadzam sie, ze Ukraina dostala od nas maksymalna liczbe punktow w televotingu rowniez dzieki glosom ich emigrantow na terenie naszego kraju. Roznica jest jednak taka, ze Ukraina byla przed konkursem ogromnym faworytem fanow, bukmacherow i stowarzyszen OGAE w wielu krajach, poza tym jak widac wyniki Ukrainy w glosowaniu jury i glosowaniu widzow sa bardzo podobne, w zwiazku z czym jest jasne, ze ta piosenka sie Europie PODOBALA. Co do tekstu “nie sraj we wlasne gniazdo” – bardzo trzymam kciuki… Read more »
Ann
Guest

@ Piotr
Cholernie du?o zajmujesz si? polska emigracj?, naprawd?. Mo?e spróbuj poczyta? o emigracji ukrai?skiej? Podpowiem – u nas w tej chwili jest ich milion. twój g?os w tej dyskusji jest dla mnie najbardziej irytuj?cy! O co ci chodzi ? Po co to piszesz – no chyba, ?e jeste? fanikiem margarety. Znasz to stare przys?owie “nie…we w?asne gniazdo”? Bez pozdrowie?!

@EugeneESCUK
Guest
Graph:- Many thanks for the suggestion. I tried different things but did not think of that. It still is not lightning quick like other sites but it is a lot better thanks. Some serious issues with this site that is for sure. It is a shame Wiwibloggs had no comment to make about this. It is always the same, it is all about getting bigger and more popular, but what some forget is what is always the MOST important thing in any business……….the CUSTOMER. One reader can get personally insulted and attacked by another and it is very often totally… Read more »
David
Guest

@Ali:

Please keep your thinly veiled pseudo-nazi thoughts about muslims to yourself.

sonic0201
Guest

Personally I find Michal Szpak in the Top 10 questionable too, but here is what I said on 10th April under Eurovision In Concert 2016 post:
“His song might be dated (really dated), but his performance is full of life, and he’s got great vocals. I have a feeling there are many hidden votes behind him across Europe, just like in Poland, so don’t be surprised if he makes the Top 15 or higher in Stockholm.”
There is no question diaspora helped him a lot, but there were lots of non-polish people who voted for him too.

Ali
Guest
Fussiore – Soon , you will become a muslim world ( western Europe) if you hate so much european heritage ( eastern countries ). We Slavic countries gave you freedem not once but many times . You hate so much Polish, call them toilet cleaners , but you will become toilet cleaners yourselves in your own countries . They will overtake you by numbers and vote for themselves – like this year`s for mayor of London . Just wait few years . Poland stopped Muslims in 1683 and not alow them to overrun Europe . But if you can`t appreciate… Read more »
an esc fan
Guest

I wanted to see the video of your famous Margaret to understand why you think
that she were better for ESC. Are you serious ? That girl sings about her being
so hot and horny, such an embarrassment !
Yes Michal’s song is cheesy, so ? Why do you think that means unlikeable ?
It’s a genre that will never go away.

TypicFussoire
Guest

@Piotr
So next time no Poland on Eurovision anyway your songs always were awful 😉
Not like in our West Europe Elite.

Piotr
Guest
Hehe, firstly – stop comparing Polish diaspora’s voting in years 2007-2011 and now… if you had knowledge then you would know that Polish people started massive emmigration to European Western countries in 2007-2008. In the past it was UK, Ireland and of course Germany, now there are new directions – Norway, Sweden, Italy, the Netherlands, even Iceland! I’m Polish and I know it, do you think that I wanna harm my own country by saying these things about diasporas? Of course not, but I just wanna be true, I’m telling the facts. Again, I DONT SAY THAT MICHAL GOT ALL… Read more »
Redfox
Guest
what Russia doesn´t get is that yeah, the song appeals to the audience. but most of Europe doesnt listen to the same beat, same melody coming from every car radio ever for the last 30 years… it is nothing special, just a typical russian schlager. I don´t think it was political. the jury gave marks to a song, not a show. and there is not a lot of originality in it. Poland???? omg what is wrong with peoples ears. ah, I know, it is the 8 million polish who clean toilets in other countries. I am sad about Netherlands. He… Read more »
Tony KuKo
Guest

Yeah get rid off the jury and then we’d start having again the Greece-Cyprus 12 points exchange, all of the Balkans and Scandinavia in the final, and people will start with the “it’s all East” again.

I can’t believe Austria would want televoting-only back. In 2008 they withdrew because of that reason and they didn’t come back after seeing Germany under the new system.

And the idea of the massive Polish diaspora voting is hilarious. During the televoting-only years Poland reached the Top 10 once (in 2003) and the final once (2008).

Graph
Guest

@Eugene,

One thing that helps get on the site is to run your web browser in Incognito/Private mode. For me this has helped a lot over the past few days.

ESC Facts
Guest

NB : I forgot about Austria who was 8th with the televotes but juries placed Austria 24th thus making them finish 13th

ESC Facts
Guest
This a very long comment, so bear with me 🙂 I’ve done some little research about the correlation between the jury & the televotes especially with the similarities in the Top 10 between these two for the final, in order to see if the jury follows the viewers (if the Top 10 from the jury is the same from the viewers) 2016 : 8 countries were both in the Top 10 from the televotes and in the Top 10 from the jury (Ukraine, Australia, Russia, Bulgaria, Sweden, France, Armenia, Belgium), and it’s a record ! 2015 : 7 countries were… Read more »
Macbeth
Guest

I’M from Romania and i live in italy .. and i voted for POLAND… guys its not diaspora.. Poland had the best song/ performance … i loved it and i would vote for it again . i wass so sad to see Michal so dissapointed of Europe, knowing that the wiews and polls were in his favors.. 🙁

Alex
Guest

I really can’t explain how Poland reached 3rd place on televoting.. Maybe the easy and catchy and silly and cheesy lyrics presented behind helped, but 3rd place!?

All I know is noone can blame diaspora, ’cause if it was just the diaspora making the difference, then how do u explain Poland’s 2005,2006,2007,2008 placings?..

I still believe that Europe thought Poland did send Margaret, how couldnt they after all! ‘Cause 3rd place on televoting and 25th on juries sounds totally like a Margaret result. lol.

karminowe.usta
Guest

Polish diaspora in Russia, Albania, Hungary, San Marino, Belarus? Isn`t possible. 36 countries voted for Michal Szpak. Also 41 countries voted for Sergey Lazarev but only 21 gave Russia any point. It`s incredible. Sergey and Michal are very good vocalist. Their songs are catchy and beautiful. They deserved at first (Russia) and third place.

@EugeneESCUK
Guest

William :-

Error establishing a database connection
Error establishing a database connection
Error establishing a database connection
Error establishing a database connection

Perhaps Wiwibloggs should run a poll to see the number of readers who have had this message? The problem is they can’t get on the site!!

Pavel :-

And what about the other 25 then? We’ll just ignore those then?

Diaspora helps if the scoring gets tight at the top, that’s it.

Sweden can get 48 points from the Nordics…………………so what? You cannot achieve very much in the ESC without the other countries, especially if you want to win.

Tommy
Guest

Many of u say it’s only diaspora voting for Poland… It’s really not possible to get 3rd place only with diaspora, even the husband of J.K. Rowling voted for him, check her Twitter 😀

Fussoire
Guest

@Mark W – “The whole reason I love Eurovision so much is that it DOES bring countries together. “. Go tell to Armenia, Azerbaidjan, Russia and Ukraine!

rnd100
Guest

So Russia has huge Polish diaspora somewhere, it seems? Strange, I didn’t see them anywhere around. Countries like Azerbaijan or Georgia have no meaningful Polish minority but voted Poland highly anyway. People continue to invent some huge Polish diaspora voting for Shpack, instead of just admitting that his performance was great.

an
Guest

Switzerland was better than Poland in Second Semi Final ? This is joke jury….

PabloA.
Guest

Poland’s diaspora in Austria ? Italy ? Hungary ? San Marino ? Its sth new for me…

M. Szpack have amazing voice ! He should be in first 5 in my opinion ( and not only in my)

Voices wievers are more important than unknown jurys….

Pavel
Guest

Of these 35, 25/41 (61%) ranked Poland in the Top 6 giving them 5 to12 points.

Still think it is diaspora?
+++++
At least 10 of them have a diaspora. others are slavic countries
Even last year televote scoped 47 points for Poland whilst juries gave 2.

CookyMonzta
Guest

Methinks it may be getting time for Wiwi to move the entire site to a new server. You can’t blame the “Error establishing a database connection” message on the traffic now, because the contest is long over with.

CookyMonzta
Guest

@Pollaski: I agree with you on keeping the jury in place. Here’s an idea that might satisfy some people: How about a separate Jury Award and a Televoters’ Award, to go with the overall contest trophy and those Bezençon Awards? Or am I expecting too much here?

tania
Guest

regarding eastern and western eurovision
western countries (e.g. great britain) have very good music at home but they don’t send such type of music or singers to eurovision (like adele, birdy etc)
it seems to me that they are not already eager to win this competition. and only eastern countries bring some vividness, interest and zeal )
for example, at home russia named their participation in eurovision “conquering europe” 🙂 that’s why they try so much and spend so much money on winning at eurovision. and get so infuriated each year they lose

Homer
Guest

As always juries were a lot better than the ignorant televoting. If it wasn’t for them, Georgia’s masterpiece wouldn’t even made it to the final! Seriously, is the televoting so freakin dumb to give Russia’s garbage a 1st place? LOOOL! Not that i’m a fan of Australia’s entry but i prefer it a lot more. Anyway, Jamala absolutely deserved this, her performance was something simply phenomenal and honestly, i think it’s one of the best winners ever.

tania
Guest

@EugeneESCUK
regarding poland. szpak is said to perform much worse for jury than for the final. maybe that’s the reason.

Ern
Guest

You have to admit, in recent years, the Western countries are sending better songs. It isn’t the jury vote that is helping the West get into the top 5.

10 years ago, it was only Eastern Europe (plus Greece, Sweden and Norway) that cared about Eurovision. Now, it’s everyone, and the competition is much more intense.

MMs
Guest

@Angelo: you think all of the Maltese entries that passed to the finals were not good to do so? Keep your argument and your hate for yourself. Just because you don’t like it doesn’t mean there is suspicion. How stupid. 2012 was energetic, 2013 and 2014 found a niche and were good song, 2016 was just amazing.

Stan
Guest
In the old days there were only juries and noone complained about them. I’m from Belgium, Laura got a better score from juries than televoters… Why? The song was nice, the staging was good. There was no better way to kick of the show. But in the end, televoters forgot about her, while juries have a nice score sheet to go over and rank all songs accordingly. Televoting has a lot more variabilities. There’s diaspora and neighbourly voting. There are also rumours that countries like Azerbaijan buy sim cards in smaller countries like Malta or Moldova (the televote gave her… Read more »
MMs
Guest
Damn those televoters just like countries not the songs. 🙁 All of you saying juries helping Malta is suspicious are certainly wrong. Malta got different amount of points from different juries, they also did not receive points from some countries and with only one 12 so there is nothing really suspicious. Just because you want to hate that does not mean that the juries are suspiciously helping Malta. Sad for Malta making the list of being helped by juries when it was such a good song tough admittedly the staging could have been better. But hey Lithuania still got that… Read more »
David
Guest
Honestly, how can this be a discussion on whether Poland’s televote score was due to diaspora or not? Clearly it’s BOTH due to a very strong diaspora AND a song in a niche not covered by any other country and that appealed to a lot of people. That being said, whining about the juries marking it down doesn’t make any sense whatsoever. It’s quite objectively a very dated dated song (albeit well-sung), just like Austria’s and Russia’s. Doesn’t mean it’s wrong to enjoy them of course, but the way the judges’ criteria are written it won’t score you top points.… Read more »
Angelo
Guest
Jury votes can also be very fishy at times. Juries are massively supporting Malta EVERY single year. It’s remarkable, because the Maltese entries suck so bad. It is beyond me, how Malta managed to qualify in 2012, 2013, 2014 and 2016 with four dreadful and abysmal songs. The fact that Malta finished 4th this year with the jury votes in the final is simply ridiculous, for obivious reasons: – bad vocals by Ira Losco (both in the semi-final and final); – boring staging; – bland song and plastic song (typically Swedish); – cliche dance routine by a dancer. I suspect… Read more »
@EugeneESCUK
Guest

The public in 35 out of the 41 countries (85%) ranked Poland in the Top 10 and gave them points.

Of these 35, 25/41 (61%) ranked Poland in the Top 6 giving them 5 to12 points.

Still think it is diaspora?

Angelo
Guest
A possible explanation why Poland did better this year than last year is because of the new voting system. Juries were able to rank Poland last on their list last year, so Poland would get 0 points (regardless whether they received the maximum televotes in a certain country). With the new voting system juries are no longer able to do that; they can rank Poland last on their list, but they can’t prevent or manipulate the televoting results. The same goes for Lithuania, since there are many Lithuanians throughout Europe. Last year they received 0 points from the UK because… Read more »