Photo: Sarah Louise Bennett / EBU
The Big 5 have participated in a draw to determine which half of the Eurovision final they’ll sing in. But Italy and Spain will have to wait. That’s because they drew the new “producer’s choice” category, which allows producers to put them wherever they see fit.
 
Sweden, the host country, drew their starting position at the Head of Delegation meeting in March. Marcus & Martinus will open the grand final after drawing spot #1. 

Big 5 Draw results

🇫🇷 France – Second Half

🇩🇪 Germany – First Half

🇮🇹 Italy – Producer’s Choice

🇪🇸 Spain – Producer’s Choice

🇬🇧 United Kingdom – First Half

In March, executive producer Christer Björkman explained why producers were introducing the new category.

“It’s all about creating the best TV show possible and giving all artists a chance to shine. In previous years, with just the First Half and Second Half draws you might find many ballads ended up in the same part of the show or many favourites were drawn to perform in the same half. Adding the flexibility of Producer’s Choice gives me the ability to create an even better flow of different tempos and an even more thrilling Grand Final.”

 

Subscribe
Notify of
guest

65 Comments
Newest
Oldest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Rachel
Rachel
5 months ago

So that’s Italy in slot 23 or 24 and Spain in wherever they can shove it near a ballad. UK will close out the first half I think. Germany are gonna get like 3 or 4 and France will be put as close to another big favourite of another genre as possible or if some of the less strong vocalists get through then directly between them.

Fatima
Fatima
5 months ago
Reply to  Rachel

If Bjorkman really wants France to win then he’ll put them directly after two successive less strong vocalists. We need to be wary of two or more producer’s choices in a row

Patrick
Patrick
5 months ago

It’s so rigged rhey aren’t even trying very hard to disguise it any more

Gaga
Gaga
5 months ago

unlimited time for voting means more corrupted votes. Azerbaijan corrupted voting a few years ago when they disseminated SIM cards in small countries, remember? Im sure this open a room for cheating for countries like Azerbaijan again…

Karl
Karl
5 months ago
Reply to  Gaga

I’m going to vote for Azerbaijan because they deserve to qualify. Deal with it.

Gaga
Gaga
5 months ago
Reply to  Karl

Then you side with the wrong side of events. One day they will come after you, too…

idk
idk
5 months ago

what does that even mean, they decide the running order anyway

Ted
Ted
5 months ago

The UK which has drawn in the first half needs to be after the 9pm watershed ?
(For continental wiwi readers, the show starts at 8pm UK time)

The homoerotic dancing I can cope with, it’s the sticky out tongues which turn me off

Gaga
Gaga
5 months ago
Reply to  Ted

They should cancel all prime programmes so people watch Eurovision and root for Olly lol

Boozyfloozy69
Boozyfloozy69
5 months ago
Reply to  Ted

Grow up

Vjera Brdar
Vjera Brdar
5 months ago

Stupid and awful.
And ugh I still cannot get over the fact that voting will begin from the start of the show. We had this before and it was abandoned.. For a reaaon.

jercle
jercle
4 months ago
Reply to  Vjera Brdar

I know! 2010 and 2011, and the EBU dumped it because it wasn’t a success.

And now it’s back, without really saying why they think it’ll work this time.

With Sweden performing first, the optics look terrible. They’ll look even worse if they drop again after this edition.

Keiino as mustard
Keiino as mustard
5 months ago

If you think about it, if countries are allocated just first or second half then there is massive producer’s discretion anyway. Nothing wins purely because of running order.

Voting from the start makes things a lot fairer. It definitely harmed Austria last year.

Expect Italy to be in second half.

Wonder what will come second after Sweden? San Marino or Czechia would be a good shout if they qualify to provide contrast to song 1. Or perhaps a ballad…

Karl
Karl
5 months ago

If Italy get a sh!tty spot, I hope they withdraw in protest.

FunQ
FunQ
5 months ago
Reply to  Karl

Of course they will get a sh!tty spot. Do you think SVT and Bjorkman would give an advantage to a direct competitor? We will see if they play fair or not.

Erik
Erik
5 months ago
Reply to  FunQ

Björkman has been responsible in 2013, 2016, 2017, 2018, 2019 and now in 2024. He’s a professional and I have no doubts he’ll make it better than ever.

Henry
Henry
5 months ago
Reply to  Erik

Let me guess… you are from Sweden?

Gaga
Gaga
5 months ago
Reply to  Karl

Italy doesn’t like being the winner. Why do people forcefully push them for a victory again? Italy got even mad and refused to host the contest after winning it a few years ago. Italy abandoned the contest outright. Why would you vote for Italy then?

Jonas
Jonas
5 months ago
Reply to  Gaga

The junior contest doesn’t count.

Patrick
Patrick
5 months ago
Reply to  Karl

He will probably put her second

Liam Lindsay
Liam Lindsay
5 months ago

Big 5 + Host potential running order slots:

Sweden #1
Germany #2
Spain #8
UK #12
France #16
Italy #23

Arch
Arch
5 months ago

I don’t agree with this producer’s thing. I don’t agree with the producer deciding the running order to begin with. So, this new rule this year…it’s like, when you think they can’t surprise negatively anymore & you find out you were wrong.

Seimi
Seimi
5 months ago
Reply to  Arch

100% ! All positions should be chosen in a blind draw.

jercle
jercle
4 months ago
Reply to  Seimi

But that has its disadvantages too. The UK was such a dreadful opener in 2012, for example. It’s hard to say which is better, random draw or producer-decided. Both have pros and cons.

Bryan
Bryan
5 months ago

I think this rule of voting between performances will be for eurofans to vote and those who are not eurofans will wait to see everything to vote like every year so being in the 2nd part is preferable to have a memory of the voters. you have to know the eurofans represent 5% in the final so it will have a lot of votes after all the countries

Retkoceri
Retkoceri
5 months ago
Reply to  Bryan

5%? More like 0.1%

Tino
Tino
5 months ago
Reply to  Retkoceri

I know we eurofans are very few but believe me we are more than 0,1%. It depends on what you call fans. And we also are the ones that vote the most. Lambda viewers generally send like 2 votes, 3 at best. I don’t know about you but me (and some other fans I know) generally cast more than 10 votes on the final.

Ari
Ari
5 months ago

The spin will be, as always: it’s not because of me. I just wanna be helpful. It came from the EBU, really. They more or less forced me to just decide everything as I please. Puke.

Eurogambler
Eurogambler
5 months ago

How did we arrive at this point? I’m reading the comments here and it’s clear that nobody is happy about this new rule.

I find the voting from the start of the show a bigger problem, since it means more votes and so each individual call is likely to count for less. I hate to be cynical, but voting will also be more vulnerable to fixing.

Fatima
Fatima
5 months ago
Reply to  Eurogambler

Both rules changes make it easier for producers to influence the result. That should become clearer when we see two or more producers choices in a row next week.

Chingiz Tulegenov
Chingiz Tulegenov
5 months ago
Reply to  Eurogambler

Oh yes, feels like that point is being dusted off. Thanks for highlighting this!

Justice
Justice
5 months ago

Theres no way germany will be out 2nd. These produces care about views only! Larger nations with bigger populations will get teh better slots later on. While smaller unfortunate nations will be shoved into earlier draws just killing their chances. Look at the semifinals. Poor malta, serbia, albania early as always

Erik
Erik
5 months ago
Reply to  Justice

Songs. Based on the mood of the song and sometimes logistics. If you have a gigantic set to stage you preferably put that one after one of the breaks. Placing 4 ballads after each other would not really make it beneficial for any of those songs. Possibly for the uptempo song after that. But you make an order that keeps the tension and don’t place very similar songs after each other.

Purple Mask
Purple Mask
5 months ago

Normally this would be big news. However, as viewer voting will now commence from the start of the show, running order will probably have less of an impact than in previous years.
There is also the scenario that a lot of the audience will vote for Sweden right at the start, then get bored and/or run out of money/parental permission to vote again.

Anna
Anna
5 months ago
Reply to  Purple Mask

There is also a chance that it gets fewer votes because of the fact that many TV viewers tune in later. That has been statistically proved also.

Musiclover
5 months ago
Reply to  Anna

It dosent matter. People wote for a country, and not to the music

Eve
Eve
5 months ago
Reply to  Musiclover

And thats stupid

Eurofan23
Eurofan23
5 months ago

My favorite entry continues to be Switzerland. It’s one of the boldest, boldest and most original songs I’ve ever seen in this competition. Hate me if you want, but it’s my honest opinion.

Johnny
Johnny
5 months ago
Reply to  Eurofan23

Great, but this is not the topic now, is it.

Itchymonkey
Itchymonkey
5 months ago

Let’s aid Italy Sweden and the big countries to keep domination. That’s what all these new categories should be titled

Dominic
Dominic
5 months ago

This new draw of “Producer’s choice” is dodgy. Drawing only halves instead of actual spots is biased enough, and this is even worse. So, now it’s up to the producers whether La noia is helped to win, or not. Also, what are the chances of poor Germany being the designated 2nd or 3rd? Usually it’s Albania, but they aren’t qualifying, are they?

Dascha
Dascha
5 months ago
Reply to  Dominic

Germany will never be put in such an early slot, because of high viewership.
The intention of producers determining the running order is to raise viewing figures, which in turn means higher profit. As the country with the biggest population in Eurovision, producers wouldn’t want 80 million potential German viewers to abandon the show after two songs, since many people only tune in to watch their own country’s entry.

Jo.
Jo.
5 months ago
Reply to  Dascha

This. I was thinking about this today, and also that the best spot in the R/O now is the one that you’re surrounded by countries that typically don’t vote for your own.

Jonas
Jonas
5 months ago

Germany will be No. 2…

Nadiia
Nadiia
5 months ago

The Big 5 spots in the Semis were drawn or by producers?

Then the producer put Spain and Italy in the second half already in the Semis. And Italy on a good spot at the end.
Can they do that again?
Otherwise they will put at a good spot in the first half.

Musiclover
5 months ago

I hope Italy be nr 2

Ari
Ari
5 months ago
Reply to  Musiclover

Not even Björkman is that shameless. Or is he?

Fabian
Fabian
5 months ago
Reply to  Musiclover

UK deserves NR2.

Ari
Ari
5 months ago
Reply to  Fabian

Absolutely. But that spot never goes to those who deserve it.

Fatima
Fatima
5 months ago
Reply to  Fabian

They won’t want it there, it’s before the watershed

Boozyfloozy69
Boozyfloozy69
5 months ago
Reply to  Fabian

No it doesn’t Spain does

Ari
Ari
5 months ago

Great. Italy’s fate is partly in the hands of that guy. I’m sure nothing can go wrong. Producer’s Choice… the title alone is so obnoxious.

ANDREW BROWN
ANDREW BROWN
5 months ago
Reply to  Ari

Remember when the split first half second half was introduced it was stop all ballads/uptempo being together! well that worked didn’t it!! now we have producers choice. One mans opinion were a song should be placed! how come since 1956 until 2010’s everything worked fine by a FAIR random draw.

Ari
Ari
5 months ago
Reply to  ANDREW BROWN

It worked perfectly and stopping it is one of the worst things to ever happen to Eurovision, the worst probably being Björkman himself. Having clueless executives who aren’t very smart or as power hungry as that guy served the contest better.

Musiclover
5 months ago
Reply to  Ari

Björkman hane nothing to do whit this. Its EBZu. And they love Italy. And do what they can to help them. This is not ok

Milla
Milla
5 months ago
Reply to  Ari

They had to meet Christer half way. I’ve heard he wanted almost all the power. For Italy I hope no favorism..

Ari
Ari
5 months ago
Reply to  Milla

They had to meet him no way.

Jonas
Jonas
5 months ago
Reply to  Ari

They had to meet him in a dark alley, where he showed them all the blackmail material he has on them.

Ari
Ari
5 months ago
Reply to  Jonas

Haha perhaps. Or maybe they simply don’t care and let him walk all over the contest without having to blackmail them. The way he said he saved Bulgaria 2016… a strong delegation comes with a strong vision… it feels like he’s taking all this space because nobody will stand up to him.

Milla
Milla
5 months ago
Reply to  Ari

It’s true. That’s what’s been said here in Sweden anyway.

Ari
Ari
5 months ago
Reply to  Milla

I’m not doubting it’s true he wanted everything and more. I just mean they didn’t have to give him anything. This guy doesn’t own the contest. What’s he gonna do? Quit? Good, I’d love that. And he’d never quit anyway.

Milla
Milla
5 months ago
Reply to  Milla

People in Sweden find it ridiculous as well.. so…

Marlinken
Marlinken
5 months ago
Reply to  Ari

The only reason anyone has to suspect Sweden of sabotage is that they put an effort into their Eurovision songs and are perceived as doing the contest well. That’s literally it.

Ari
Ari
5 months ago
Reply to  Marlinken

We are not talking about their Eurovision songs but about one man’s power trip.

Chingiz Tulegenov
Chingiz Tulegenov
5 months ago
Reply to  Ari

Well said, Ari! It was exactly my thought!